Some new research on the Newmark Displacement Method for earthquake-induced landslides indicates that the method may be on the unconservative side. The Landslide Blog provides a short summary of the paper by Li et al. (2018) that was recently published in the journal Landslides. Their research was based on physical models on a shake table, comparing the results of the model experiments with a Newmark analysis. The paper should be worth a read for geotechnical engineers practicing in seismically active areas. It sounds like some additional study is needed to confirm these results and if they are true, propose different ways of analyzing earthquake-induced landslides.
Related Articles
New Landslide and Tsunami Fears at Anak Krakatoa in Indonesia
January 7, 2019
rockman
Geologic Hazards, News
Comments Off on New Landslide and Tsunami Fears at Anak Krakatoa in Indonesia
Fears of another landslide and possible tsunami are mounting for the Anak Krakatoa volcano in the Sunda Strait, Indonesia. Scientists with Indonesia’s Meteorology, Climatology and Geophysics Agency (BMKG) have discovered new cracks that could be […]
New paper: a historic landslide-induced tsunami in Lake Geneva
November 12, 2012
rockman
Geologic Hazards
Comments Off on New paper: a historic landslide-induced tsunami in Lake Geneva