• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
GeoPrac.net

Our Sponsors

  • Home
  • About
    • Our Sponsors
  • Articles
  • News
    • Search By Tag
  • Events
    • Events Main
    • Add an Event
    • Webinars
    • Conferences
    • Calls For Abstracts
  • Resources
    • Links
  • Contact Us
News Ticker
  • [ September 12, 2025 ] Ground Improvement Strategies: Insights from Recent Webinars Available Resources
  • [ September 11, 2025 ] DFI Announces 2025 Distinguished Service Award Recipient Press Releases
  • [ September 4, 2025 ] AASHTO Releases 45th Edition of Materials Standards: What Geotechnical Engineers Need to Know Standards and Codes
  • [ September 3, 2025 ] RSWall Webinar Recap: Advanced Gabion Wall Solutions with Rocscience and Maccaferri Available Resources
  • [ September 2, 2025 ] Nicholson Legends and Iconic Projects: A 70-Year Celebration of Geotechnical Excellence Available Resources
HomeNewsGeologic HazardsUSDOE Problems With [Not] Storing Nuclear Waste

USDOE Problems With [Not] Storing Nuclear Waste

February 18, 2008 rockman Geologic Hazards Comments Off on USDOE Problems With [Not] Storing Nuclear Waste

 

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • More
  • Pocket
  • Share on Tumblr
  • nuclear power plant
  • nuclear waste
  • radioactive waste
  • USDOE
  • Yucca Mountain
Previous

Seeing Beneath the Surface: Use of Ground Penetrating Radar in Earth Science Research

Next

Series of Articles on Seismic Analysis

Related Articles

Radioactive waste barrel for possible future underground storage
Project Related

Parsons Brinckerhoff secures nuclear disposal deal

October 18, 2011 rockman Project Related Comments Off on Parsons Brinckerhoff secures nuclear disposal deal

Parsons Brinkerhoff will provide ‘technical support’ for an underground nuclear waste repository in the UK after signing a contract with the UK’s Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA). No details are available yet on the plan or […]

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • More
  • Pocket
  • Share on Tumblr
Loading contaminated soil into a truck near the Hanford Nuclear site. A former plutonium production reactor is in the background.
Geophysics

Hanford nuclear waste retrieval resumes with better technology (GPR)

July 1, 2010 rockman Geophysics Comments Off on Hanford nuclear waste retrieval resumes with better technology (GPR)

Ground penetrating radar (GPR) imaging of the subsurface tied to GPS mapping will allow the CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company to have a better idea of what is buried at the site before excavating for […]

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • More
  • Pocket
  • Share on Tumblr
Available Resources

Yucca Mountain – $32 Billion More

July 17, 2008 rockman Available Resources Comments Off on Yucca Mountain – $32 Billion More

Thanks to Harold at the Ontario-geofish blog, I came accross this AP article that releases the first Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository cost estimate update since 2001. The US DOE now puts the cost of the facility at $90 billion, up $32 billion from that 2001 estimate. Of course that estimate is slightly deceptive. It covers the $9 billion already spent and 100 years of operation. Perhaps the bigger issue is funding has not been secured largely in part to the efforts of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (Democrat-NV). If a steady stream of money can be secured, the best case scenario for the facility is a 2020 opening. 

I also found a neat blog called Yucca Facts that has a refreshing perspective on the facility that is pro-science if not necessarily pro-Yucca. They also have a commentary about this latest DOE announcement and some commentary on Senator Reid.

[…]

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • More
  • Pocket
  • Share on Tumblr

Our Sponsors

Upcoming Events

Check out these upcoming events for geoprofessionals! You can submit your own events, or go to calendar view as well.

Notice
There are no upcoming events.

Our Sponsors

Random Post by Image (Feeling Lucky?)

  • Some messy Data
  • Bentley Consolidates Geotechnical Software Under Seequent
  • Repairs to the old Devil's Slide landslide area on CA Highway 1, soon to be abandoned when the tunnel bypass opens.
  • Micropile project in Northern Baltimore County
  • Worker clears sludge from Brightwater TBM
  • Hayward Baker’s iconic calendar comes to life with augmented reality app
  • Trevi Tiger hydromill capable of constructing slurry walls to a depth of 250 meters
  • SuperGIS Engine 3.1 Beta is released
  • LIDAR imagery from New England archaeological sites
Follow on Facebook
Recent Comments
  • Randy Post on Video of Highway 101 Landslide in California
  • GE Reviewer on San Francisco Millennium Tower Has Settled 16 Inches
  • Agus on New FHWA Soil Nail Manual Addresses LRFD, Hollow Bars
  • geoengineer Spain on Engineering Geologists vs Geological Engineers vs Geotechnical Engineers
  • Blaine J. Guidry, P.E. on A Whole Lotta Shakin’ Goin’ On: Center for Geotechnical Modeling Facilitates Seismic Research

Copyright © 2007-2020 by Randy Post